San Francisco Natural Areas Overview
Welcome to SF Natural Areas!! This site is for, by, and about the volunteers who work to preserve and protect the remnant habitats within San Francisco.
Unlike most other major urban areas, San Francisco’s steep topography has prevented the sort of torched-earth development that completely obliterated all traces of original landscapes elsewhere. In fact, 1100 acres (that’s 27%) of the San Francisco parks system are officially designated Significant Natural Resource Areas because they still contain irreplaceable biological communities. Other mostly-pristine remnant areas are owned by other public entities including the Public Utilities Commission and the Presidio Trust.
These public lands are under constant threat, however, from invasive weeds and over-use — and this is where volunteers come in. Volunteers with the Natural Areas Program of the San Francisco Recreation and Park Department (RPD) contribute tens of thousands of hours each year pulling weeds, maintaining trails, and propagating and planting native plants.
In fact, Natural Areas Program volunteers constitute over 25% of all RPD volunteer hours even though the Natural Areas Program has only 2% of RPD staff and receives only 1% of the RPD budget. The Natural Areas Program is underfunded and understaffed by a factor of ten. Volunteers are what prevent these priceless biological assets in San Francisco from collapsing into weedy ruin.
Anyway, other natural areas managers besides the SFRPD include the Presidio Trust which runs its own volunteer program; the National Park Service, which runs the Golden Gate National Recreation Area; the SF Public Utilities Commission which owns important remnant areas near Laguna Honda; and UCSF, which owns and manages Mt Sutro. Plus, there are other important groups which play crucial roles in San Francisco’s preservation of its biological heritage.
However, what has been missing is a site where volunteers can post their photos and tell their stories about working in these remarkable areas. That need is what this site attempts to fill. This site also, over time, may become an integrated botanical guide to San Francisco’s native plants, though this be an over-ambitious goal.
Browse the Events, Photos, and Blogs to see what’s happening at all the various Natural Areas. To track quickly and easily the most recent contributions, check the general blog section and the general photo section. These combine all content from all the natural areas we cover in reverse chronological order, so the newest stuff is always the first you’ll see.
Additional Information
General Blog Posts
These posts concern general SF Natural Areas themes. For posts regarding an individual site, go to that site's main page. For all blog posts from all sites in chronological order, go here.
Extended Testing for the Site
29 January 2008 - 12:59, Tinman said:
Permalink
In addition to monitoring users’ feedback about content and structure, we’re also going to be watching closely the volume of traffic we get here. We currently are hosting the site via a quite limited connection, so if you find the site’s performance seems lame, that’s the reason. If you do find that is the case, we want to hear about it. Either post a comment here or email us. Thanks!
Comments
There are no comments so far.
A New Natural Areas Web Site
28 January 2008 - 18:50, Tinman said:
Permalink
So why did we bother putting together this site? Certainly there are plenty of other resources for nature enthusiasts in San Francisco.
Partly it was just an excuse to try out a new development platform—Ruby on Rails. But mostly it was because there aren’t any other toolkits for enabling communication amongst volunteers and handling practical matters like managing reminders, RSVPs, and the like. Certainly, other volunteer groups like One Brick have their own web systems, but they’re involved in many other types of projects.
In contrast, this site is specifically and exclusively for habitat restoration work in San Francisco.
We welcome your feedback and suggestions about this site. What works and what doesn’t? How should we evolve its features? Please post your comments here. Thanks for your interest!
Comments
There are no comments so far.